In Hall v Middleton, Manhattan Industrial Division Justice Jennifer G. Schecter granted a $1 million punitive-damages award in the direction of defendant Middleton because of presence of such circumstances.
Veritaseum, Inc. (the “Agency”) is a financial know-how agency that makes use of blockchain-based markets to permit transactions between folks. All through preliminary conversations between plaintiff Charles Hall (“Hall”) and the Agency’s CEO, Reggie Middleton (“Middleton”), Middleton made representations to Hall regarding the Agency’s pending patent functions for proprietary know-how concerning utilizing block-chain know-how and cryptocurrencies for the execution of fine contracts, to entice Hall to spend cash on the Agency. Middleton represented to patrons that the Agency had pending patent functions, inflicting them to think about that they is perhaps investing in a company which may finally private the patents.
Hall commenced the movement derivatively on behalf of the Agency in the direction of Middleton for breach of his fiduciary duties to the Agency by misappropriating the Agency’s belongings, along with its psychological property.
After trial, the Court docket docket found that Middleton “breached his fiduciary obligation of loyalty to the Agency by diverting possession of the patents to himself.” Justice Schecter extra determined that the Agency (and by no means Middleton) should have owned the patents and thus totally different entities’ use of the patents would entitle the Agency (and by no means Middleton) to a licensing cost.
All through trial, Middleton argued that, whatever the fiduciary relationship between the occasions, there needn’t be perception in cryptocurrency transactions because of such transactions are inherently “unbreakable ensures.” The Court docket docket disagreed, stating that there’s a need for perception amongst fiduciaries. The Court docket docket extra well-known that when perception is flagrantly violated, “there should be precise, vital penalties to make it possible for it doesn’t happen as soon as extra. One thing in want of essential punitive damages would extra, not thwart, duplicity.”
To be entitled to punitive damages, “a defendant’s conduct should be directed on the general public often” (see Sherry Assocs. v Sherry-Netherland, Inc., 273 A.D.2nd 14, 15, 708 N.Y.S.2nd 105 [1st Dept 2000]). Punitive damages are meant as punishment for gross misbehavior for the great of most people and to discourage the defendant from repeating the wrongful act (see Le Mistral, Inc. v Columbia Broad. Sys., 61 AD2d 491, 494–95 [1st Dept 1978]).
In Hall, the Court docket docket determined that because of Middleton clearly breached his fiduciary obligation of loyalty to the Agency, he is also held accountable for punitive damages “regardless of whether or not or not his conduct was aimed on the general public often.” The Court docket docket well-known that Middleton’s conduct impacted most people because of he solicited investments from most people based mostly totally on his misrepresentations regarding the Agency’s possession of the patents along with carried out an illegal preliminary coin offering that resulted inside the SEC issuing a consent order, thus destroying the price of the Agency. Justice Schecter extra determined that:
Punitive damages are warranted because of Middleton’s diversion of belongings in breach of his fiduciary obligation to the Agency was intentional and deliberate, the related securities-law violations symbolize aggravating and outrageous circumstances and his tried scheme to efficiently steal the patents for himself was impelled by a fraudulent motive.
In lastly deciding that the plaintiff was entitled to punitive damages, the Court docket docket thought-about that the SEC had ordered Middleton to pay larger than $8 million in disgorgement and a $1 million penalty. Thus, the Court docket docket held {{that a}} $1 million punitive-damages award was “justified.”
Although punitive damages should not usually awarded in New York, practitioners should take phrase that the Industrial Division shouldn’t be afraid to grant such cures when circumstances, like these on present in Hall, require them to.
[View source.]