‘Public Resource’ Wins 2012 Case. Judge Rules Posting Regulations Online is Fair Use

Share This Post

From an EFF announcement this week:
Technical requirements like hearth and electrical codes developed by personal organizations however included into public regulation will be freely disseminated with none legal responsibility for copyright infringement, a federal appeals court docket ruled Tuesday.

The choose dominated that posting the supplies constituted truthful use — so the nonprofit group doing the posting will not be responsible for copyright infringement. The American Bar Affiliation Journal experiences:

The choice is a victory for public-domain advocate Carl Malamud and the group that he based, Public.Resource.org. The group posts authorized supplies on its web sites, together with the requirements developed by the three organizations that sued… “It has been over 10 years since plaintiffs filed go well with on this case,” stated Malamud in a press launch by the Digital Frontier Basis. “The U.S. Courtroom of Appeals has discovered decisively in favor of the proposition that residents should not be relegated to economy-class entry to the regulation.”

In 2012 Carl Malamud answered questions from Slashdot readers.

And now, lastly, from the EFF’s announcement:

Tuesday’s ruling by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Courtroom of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upholds the concept that our legal guidelines belong to all of us, and we should always have the ability to discover, learn, and share them freed from registration necessities, charges, and different roadblocks… “In a nation ruled by the rule of regulation, personal events don’t have any enterprise controlling who can learn, share, and communicate the principles to which we’re all topic,” EFF Authorized Director Corynne McSherry stated. “We’re happy that the Courtroom of Appeals upheld what different U.S. courts, together with the Supreme Courtroom, have stated for nearly 200 years: Nobody ought to management entry to the regulation.”

Or, because the EFF places it on another page, “Copyright can’t trump the important public curiosity…”

Due to long-time Slashdot reader schwit1 for sharing the information.

Related Posts